Organizing local elections on September 27 is a risky gamble since Romania…

Organizing local elections on September 27 is a risky gamble since Romania is preparing for a second wave of COVID-19. Will the measures PM Orban promised be sufficient to protect voters?

Nearly a month ago, the head of the Emergency Situations Department (DSU) – Raed Arafat – alerted Romanians to the high risk of a second wave of Covid-19 following the end of the state of emergency and the beginning of the summer holidays.

The prophecy did happen. Today, Romania is on the list of the European countries with the highest rate of new infections alongside Sweden and Serbia. Romania has recorded 555 new cases over the last 24 hours, breaking the record of 523 set on April 11. And there is no end of this trend in sight.

Faced with such situation, organizing local elections in less than three months, seems to be a risky bet for prime minister Ludovic Orban. However, the authorities announced that everything would be done to prevent the spread of the virus thanks to a series of measures. Therefore, public gatherings will be banned, wearing masks will be compulsory and polling stations will propose disinfectants and enforce social distancing.

According to the government, adapting voting conditions in this way will ensure the protection of voters from the Covid-19, provided that “all the rules must be followed”, PM Orban said.

But what if the rules are not enough to prevent the spread of the pandemic? France and Serbia have already experienced elections, in March and June respectively, with these measures. They both have shown elections, even behind a mask, could expand or bring back the spread of the coronavirus.

As PM Orban said in June 25, French President Macron stated on March 12 that “nothing stand[ed] in the way of voters going to the polling stations”. Yet, the Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) published in June 2020 a study demonstrating a correlation between participation rate and death toll. The higher the voting rate, the higher the number of deaths among the elderly was, within the next 5 weeks of the first round. From there, it would imply that the number of infected increased around the election period.

Local elected officials also paid a very high price in France. Even if there is no data about the exact number of infected, many cases of assessors and mayors were reported by the press. In the city of Coudekerque-Branche, 50% of the municipal list has tested positive for Covid-19 after they each managed a polling station.

The country was also moved by the deaths of mayors and senior officials following the local elections. However, after the second round of these elections ten days ago, already new cases were recorded, but less are expected. Maybe because people are more aware of the seriousness of the situation and thus easier respect the rules. According to the same study, shaking hands, manly hugs and sharing pens are the main explanations of the spread of the virus during elections.

Another example of the risks posed by elections is the current situation in Serbia. On June 21, the authorities organized the parliamentary elections. Since, many high-ranking officials in the ruling coalition have been tested positive for Covid-19 after attending a victory party. Yesterday, 299 new cases were reported, while in May there were only about 50 per day in average.

But one could argue that Romanians, including politicians, will fully respect all the measures and social distancing, avoiding victory gatherings among others. If so, one may then take a look at the health of democracy. Is an election with less than 50% voters really representative of democracy? In France, the level of abstention has never been so high since 1958 with 58% in the second round. In Serbia where the situation is a bit different due to the opposition boycott of the general elections, the turnout was slightly under 50%.

Consequently, some French mayors already resigned because of a lack of legitimacy they said. Certainly, most of the elected officials will stay in office, but the historic rate of abstention rises concerns about the quality of democracy.

However, in the same time, postponing the elections, scheduled on September 27, may be seen as a denial of democracy, as the opposition stated in France and states in Romania. Definitely, the government is between the hammer and the anvil, and whatever it does, it will be criticized. However, as the mayor of Coudekerque-Branche said “Democracy has no price but a health cost”. Can we accept this cost?

Note: Antoine Dewaest is working as an intern for G4Media, enhancing the understanding of the Romanian society. He is studying at Sciences Po Rennes, France.


Capital, Raed Arafat, anunț pentru românii care merg pe litoral! Măsuri urgente: Facem apel , 06/07/2020

Euronews, Coronavirus: Greece shuts Serbia border amid COVID-19 spike in the Balkans, 07/07/2020

G4Media.ro, Al doilea vârf al epidemiei. De ce refuză Guvernul să intervină cu noi măsuri. Unde a dispărut președintele Iohannis? România, în topul țărilor cu cel mai mare număr de infectări zilnice, 08/07/2020

G4Media.ro, BREAKING Record de infectări: 555 de noi cazuri de îmbolnăvire în 24 de ore. Am depășit bariera de 1.800 de morți, 08/07/2020

G4Media.ro, ULTIMA ORĂ România, Bulgaria şi Republica Moldova – puse pe lista neagră de Austria. Românii care vor să intre în Austria trebuie să stea două săptămâni în carantină, 08/07/2020

La Voix du Nord, Coronavirus : dix-sept élus qui tenaient un bureau de vote, contaminés à Coudekerque-Branche, 26/03/2020

Le Parisien, Municipales : le premier tour a-t-il vraiment entraîné «des milliers» de morts du Covid-19 ?, 11/06/2020

Marianne, Premier tour des municipales : selon trois économistes, l’organisation du scrutin a causé des milliers de morts, 10/06/2020

Ouest France, Coronavirus. France : trois maires sont morts depuis le premier tour des municipales, 03/04/2020

RFE/FL, COVID-19: Serbia Set To Impose Weekend Lockdown; WHO Finally Visits Turkmenistan, 07/07/2020

Romanian Insider, Romanian PM announces COVID-19 precautions for local elections: no public gatherings or electoral rallies, 26/06/2020

Donează prin PayPal paypal icon
Donație recurentă

Donează lunar pentru susținerea proiectului G4Media

Donează prin Transfer Bancar

CONT LEI: RO89RZBR0000060019874867

Deschis la Raiffeisen Bank
Donează prin Patreon


Abonează-te la newsletter

5 comentarii

  1. Let’s be serious. A huge bullshit is about to happen.

  2. I wonder whether you would support the same argument if, say, president Trump in the US would use the pretext of the raging covid crisis there to cancel November’s presidential elections.
    The argument has limited merit in my view: in a democracy, elections are the main channel for people to exert their power and hold the politicians to account. A decision to cancel or postpone elections cannot be taken unilaterally by the executive, outside a democratic process – or if this happens, democracy itself is suspended and then virtually anything can happen (no more accountability to voters).
    However, there are possible mitigating measures to be considered, such as online voting, extended voting time (to avoid crowding), mail voting… Some of these have even been used by Romania for its diaspora voters for the presidential poll last year.

    • Extended voting time, online voting and mail voting were already rejected by the parliament. How come are you so motivated to share mitigating strategies without a basic google check first? Romanian parliament has a long story of rejecting suggested improvements to voting accessibility, so I’m curious what’s your excuse.

  3. Only after Finishing The Erase of P$D Romania will be Free

  4. This paper from IZA is particularly troubling. It speaks about the „competence” of the „scientists” advising the French President (and this is a normal case in the whole of Europe), in reality some cosy chairs for some „specialists” (of the sort Raed Arafat likes to invoke) that are actually not scientists but medical epidemiologists who DO NOT understand how epidemiologies happen (for this it is required to be a scientist; MDs are not scientists; and not not any scientist but teams covering various scientific disciplines around the topic of epidemics). These fake experts have killed people through their incompetence and arrogance.

    And this is only one example. Country lockdown and related special decisions that have created exceptional patterns of human behaviors have exposed the most vulnerable the first // instead of simply taking care of the most vulnerable while AVOIDING triggering such behavior patterns in a period of spread of a highly-disseminating pathogen with a great percent of asymptomatics — and WE DID KNOW this by mid-March.
    I say it again: these politicians and their „experts” will have to be pursued in justice and charged with crimes against humanity.

Adaugă un comentariu

Câmpurile marcate cu * sunt obligatorii! Adresa de email nu va fi publicată.