G4Media.ro

De ce l-a retras Trump pe John Ratcliff, propus la șefia serviciilor…

Susține-ne activitatea G4Media logo
Donație Paypal recurentă

Donează lunar pentru susținerea proiectului G4Media

Donează prin Transfer Bancar

CONT LEI: RO89RZBR0000060019874867

Deschis la Raiffeisen Bank
Donează prin Patreon

Donează

Citește și...

6 comentarii

  1. Trump a angajat diversi oameni din televiziune, fiindca nu are prieteni si atat il duce capul. Nu se inghesuie nimeni sa lucreze pentru el, majoritatea posturilor din administratie ramanand neocupate.

    Asa e cand esti ticalos si tragi tzepe tuturor apropiatilor, ajungi singur, sau mai exact, singurul prieten al lui Trump e televizorul.

    • nu, pesedistule, trump nu a angajat atat de multi bugetari in administratie pentru ca si asa erau foarte multi. ba chiar ii concediaza. plus ca de ratcliff ii e frica si unei bune parti din republicani vinovati de chestii grave,nemaivorbind de tradatorii de tara stangisti din administratia obama

    • @ Aveti ce votati

      „mister” sau mai degraba tovarisci, ia buchiseste mataluta mai jos cum obama cel „meserias” a avut aceleasi probleme, DESI FUSESE REALES !

      Politics and Vetting Leave Key U.S. Posts Long Unfilled
      By Michael D. Shear
      May 2, 2013

      WASHINGTON — John Kerry is practically home alone at the State Department, toiling without permanent assistant secretaries of state for the Middle East, Asia, Europe and Africa.

      At the Pentagon, a temporary personnel chief is managing furloughs for 800,000 civilian employees.

      There has not been a director of the Internal Revenue Service since last November,

      and it was only on Thursday that President Obama announced a nomination for commerce secretary after the job was open for nearly a year.

      As the White House races this week to plug holes in the cabinet, the lights remain off in essential offices across the administration.

      The vacancies, attributed to partisan politics and lengthy White House vetting, are slowing policy making in a capital already known for inaction,

      and embarrassing a president who has had MORE THAN FIVE MONTHS SINCE HIS RE-ELECTION to fill many of the jobs.

      […]

      One of the worst backlogs is at the State Department, where

      nearly a quarter of the most senior posts are not filled,

      including those in charge of embassy security and counterterrorism.

      The Treasury Department is searching for a new No. 2,

      the Department of Homeland Security is missing its top two cybersecurity officials

      and about 30 percent of the top jobs at the Commerce Department are still vacant,

      including that of chief economist.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/us/politics/top-posts-remain-vacant-throughout-obama-administration.html

    • @asd: lasă-l pe gigel s. El e cu Bernie Sanders. Cică socialismul e ceea ce trebuie în America.

  2. Îmi place cum trolii ruși ii acuza pe ceilalți că fiind comuniști atunci când îl critica pe ineptul Trump.
    De ce nu comparați primii 2 ani din primul mandat al lui Obama cu primii 2 ai lui Trump?
    Din administrația lui Trump au plecat 15 oameni din posturi cheie fata de 4 din cea a lui Obama, 1 din cea a lui G.W. Bush și 6 din cea a lui Clinton. Pe scurt, haos.

    • @ mihai th

      nu are sens sa iti explic acum de ce il sustin pe trump :))

      pana una alta, indiferent de prostiile pe care le tot aduce in fata ochilor presa anti-trump, datele statistice rup gura tuturor propagandistilor

      1. Year
      2. Nominal GDP(in bil. US-Dollar)
      3. GDP per capita (in US-Dollar)
      4. GDP growth (real)
      5. Inflation rate (in percent)
      6. Unemployment (in percent)

      1 2 3 4 5 Unemployment
      2018 20,494.1 62,606 2.9 % 2.4 % 3.9 %
      2017 19,485.4 59,895 2.4 % 2.1 % 4.4 %
      2016 18,707.2 57,878 1.6 % 1.3 % 4.9 %
      2015 18,219.3 56,770 2.9 % 0.1 % 5.3 %
      2014 17,521.9 54,993 2.6 % 1.6 % 6.2 %
      2013 16,691.5 52,737 1.8 % 1.5 % 7.4 %
      2012 16,155.3 51,404 2.2 % 2.1 % 8.1 %
      2011 15,517.9 49,736 1.6 % 3.1 % 8.9 %
      2010 14,964.4 48,311 2.5 % 1.6 % 9.6 %
      2009 14,418.7 46,909 −2.8 % −0.3 % 9.3 %

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States#21st_century