G4Media.ro

Wess Mitchell, mesaj puternic anticorupție: Nu sunteți singuri în lupta împotriva corupției,…

Susține-ne activitatea G4Media logo
Donație Paypal recurentă

Donează lunar pentru susținerea proiectului G4Media

Donează prin Transfer Bancar

CONT LEI: RO89RZBR0000060019874867

Deschis la Raiffeisen Bank
Donează prin Patreon

Donează

10 comentarii

  1. bla, bla, bla

  2. Fac pariu ca individul nici nu stia ca exista o tara numita Romania, ma mir ca nu s-au aruncat Kovesi,Lazarica,Danilet and company la picioarele lui sa se gudure!

  3. asta face misto?
    „Sunteți un model pentru țările din jur, sunt puține țări care să aibă sistemul judiciar ca în România”
    …si cam la fel si la celelalte subpuncte (personal, m-a bufnit rasul la faza cu „stapani pe propriul destin”)

  4. S-a deeecretizat azi un protocol foarte interesant. Ii sugerez sa îl citească și sa îmi spună și mie în ce tara democrata se întâmplă asa ceva. Toți care au semnat acel protocol, și toți care l-au folosit ar trebui sa între în pușcărie imediat.

  5. @ Pudila – Prostila
    La faza cu guduratul la picioarele stapanilor o sti din propria experienta?

  6. Bun mesaj, clar, concis, raspicat. Mult mai ferm si precis decat puteam spera.

    Stramosii nostri au luptat, sangerat si murit ca Romania sa-si lege destinul de occident. Nu avem voie sa dam inapoi sau sa pierdem lupta cu fortele care incearca sa ne deturneze de la parcursul nostru istoric.

    Dinainte sa spere bunicii si strabunicii nostri ca americanii ne vor scapa din ghearele ursului turbat, inca din primul razboi mondial ne-am aliniat cu francezii, britanicii si cu americanii ulterior. Pana si conservatorii, precum Iorga, insistau ca parcursul Romaniei sa fie alaturi de Franta – tara care ulterior a devenit membru fondator al NATO si UE. Rostul nostru este aici cu astia si nu doar pentru ca asta este mostenirea, dar si pentru ca ne va fi mai bine cu astia, asa cum gandeau in mod vizionari unii precum Bratianu inca de acum un secol. Si generatia actuala a facut sacrificii pentru a obtine parteneriatul strategic care astazi ne garanteaza siguranta. Pentru ca asta era menirea noastra pe care am mostenit-o si pentru ca asta ne asigura pragmatic ce aveam nevoie. Si astazi, obtinand ce ei puteau doar spera, Romania se regaseste in cea mai avantajoasa pozitie geostrategica de la unirea principatelor!

    Nu avem voie sa dam inapoi, sa incetinim eforturile noastre. Parteneriatul nostru a fost realizat cu promisiunea ca aceste reforme vor fi facute cu buna credinta, depinde si de indeplinirea obligatiilor pe care ni le-am asumat. Nu putem lasa ca interesele pe termen scurt ale mafiei romanesti sa ne saboteze interesele nationale pe termen lung.

  7. As your constitution says, “no one is above the law.” That statement is the essence of what it means to be Western.

    Oare a priceput „redactia” ? N-o mai dati cotita, ca n-a iesit deloc, dar deloc, dupa cum ati dorit voi, „mlastina de la Bucuresti”. Astept cu interes sa ne explice Tapalaga, sa ne arate el directia si lumina, precum Scanteia pe vremuri.

  8. Wess Mitchell’s Romania…with Love from Romania

    The key words „competing for strategic influence” is what the American official seems to have been urged to acknowledge and sell to Romanian audience. Based on his speech, Romania should remain anchored in the West based on the fact that it „is part of the West by origin, history and culture…”. In other words, it must remain westernized, that is, Americanized and Europeanized, militarily, economically and politically. And it should not accept any influence from Russia or China since the former „wants to fracture it” and the latter „wants to supplant it”.

    So basically, Mitchell’s speech is to make sure that the Romanians understand that they had better remain in the sphere of influence of the US and EU rather than flirting with the Russians or Chinese! This is the basic message of the American official. A „win-lose” situation for our country but a „win-win” one for the US. Even though what president Trump has said about Russia recently runs counter rhetorically to what Mitchell has just pointed out.

    All soft (history, culture, etc.) and hard (energy, military, security, etc.) facts have been brought into the speech. Emotional appeal, too. History blends with the present, truth with manipulation.

    Apparently, not much has changed since the Cold War when the same two world powers were competing against each other until Reagan and Gorbachev met with each other! The same game has been running lately but with different actors and script through the same hard and soft tactics. The strategy is the same: deter and defend Russia and China by all and any means.

    Even though it is rather impolite, but healthy, to acknowledge the reality based on which American foreign policy seems to be a mixture of soft and hard ingredients, it may seem to be actually true. Thus, the belief in and innocence of exporting the Western/American model of democracy irrespective of the local culture, history and spirit of the target country mingles with American corporate profit and military-security operations; that is, both „the stick and the carrot”. This is the quintessence of American foreign policy. Truth mingles with hypocrisy. There are no friends but only strategic national interests, that is American. Some dictators are good for the US as long as they serve the American interests while others are bad. History can tell.

    Governments that do not reflect American interests do not last long. No wonder that there has been almost continuous unrest in South and Central America as well as in south, south-east Asia. US government, through various covert operations since WWII, have supported various dictators while pulling down regimes that apparently were elected democratically by their own people (but that ran counter the American interests in the area). And Russia/USSR, too.

    Thus, in his address at Heritage Foundation on June 6, Mitchell mentions the share of American soldiers in WWII and how they saved Europe. But he forgets that the IBM supported the logistics of the concentration camps in Nazi Germany while US government brought over to America various Nazi officers, scientists, scholars as part of the Paperclip Operation after the war.

    At the same time, Reinhard Gehlen, the leader of the Wehrmach Foreign Armies East was brought over to the US and helped the CIA know more about all Russian operations scattered throughout Eastern Europe. Shockingly enough, Gehlen was the first director of BND, the equivalent of CIA in Germany! History recycles itself.

    How about Romania? How do, not only our „leaders” and politicians, but also the people feel about the American umbrella?

    Romania is obviously between the US and Russia, mostly based on its given geostrategic location at the interference of major powers whose influence have been felt for the past centuries. Thus, the country is again caught in between the rhetorical games of western powers and Russia, hopefully not military, (even though the eastern neighbours have not become so aggressively vociferous like their American counterparts).

    Basically, Wess Mitchell does forget that „To compete” also entails the reality based on which both Russia and China are free to leverage their influence on Romania should they choose to do it. No wonder that no one in Romanian MSM talks about such influences. The expression „competing for strategic influence” in Eastern Europe renders the idea of economic, politic freedom on the part of tall those entities that would like to bear some leverage on our country, for the best and the worst. So then, it is not only the US or the EU that have a say on shaping Romania but also other external entities.

    Even the American pattern of communication and negotiation allows competition and critical conversations based on real facts and data. It is a confrontational style of doing business. This reflects mostly, nowadays, in the dynamics between the White House and the American establishment, on the one hand, and the world, on the other hand. But not between Romania and US.

    Wess Mitchell mentions Ceausescu’s regime that „tortured and executed” people. But he forgets that Ceausescu’s Romania benefited from US’s most favoured nation clause up until 1988. At the same time he was considered to be a „maverick” in the Soviet sphere of influence, a sort of a pariah or a „loose canon”, a „wild card” the Americans bet on to harass the USSR, at least. Moreover, Romania was the only country that opposed the invasion of Czechoslovakia in August 1968 while the others did join the Soviet invasion. In other words, the country did not really conform with the Soviet model, which actually was to the benefit of the Americans. But is was not western, either.

    In the 1980s the American Library in Bucharest was behind the Intercontinental Hotel and people used to go there and borrow books, various teaching materials, maps, etc. for their learning of English privately or at school. No Militia or Securitate member questioned this. At the same time, some people used to have pen pals all over the world, including Great Britain, Ireland, the US, Belgium, etc. Again, no Militia or Securitate member may have ever called on them.

    But, the USSR did not really trust Romania while the US used the country as a sort of „avant-garde” against its enemy or maybe a pawn. Who uses who? This was happening while the people were suffering from cold and hunger, especially towards the end of the 1980s. Nobody gives a damn on the people. We have seen what has happened with the people from Irak, Afganistan, Syria, etc. to name just a few recently.

    WW II’s end marked the fall of the „Iron Curtain”. W. Churchill, in one of his volumes of Memoirs mentions the fact that in October 1941 he was at the Kremlin together with Stalin. Churchill handed over to Stalin a piece of paper on which he wrote with a red pen that Romania should be 90% within the Soviet sphere of influence while Greece should belong to the West, for instance. It was not Stalin who initiated this but Churchill. So then, could we trust the British?

    Moreover, the Yalta Meeting among Roosevelt and the two above apparently „sealed off” the fate of our country. So then: why did the Americans acknowledge the Sovietization of Romania without doing anything? To please Stalin?

    Where were the Americans at the time, Mr. Mitchell?

    Our guest also mentions that Romania is a model in the region, that energy is also important (BRUA not NordStream 2). Its army has participated in the Afghan and Iraq wars, etc.

    He blames Russia for its „invasions of Georgia and Ukraine, its seizure of Crimea, systematic and prolonged destabilization of Moldova, intervention in Syria, strengthening of the Black Sea fleet”. Russia wants to fracture the West while China wants to supplant it. But, this is only part of the complex realities we have been living in since the fall of communism. It seems to have been a coup d’etat in Ukraine, sponsored by the US. Again, the enormous data on the internet speak for this. Manipulation or truth?

    Based on this speech, it is obvious that Romania has been depending on the US lately, as one of the world hegemons, besides Russia and rising China. Apparently, our country’s plight is that everything emanating from Russia and China is very, very bad while everything American is heaven.

    Unfortunately, Mitchell pushes Romania towards a „win-lose” solution with Russia which may not be good for us. A „win-win” solution is the ultimate best deal we should and could get. But, this means that there should be some openness towards Russia and China from Romania. After all, this reflects our country’s national interests. The US should respect that, if Romania is considered an EQUAL ally and partner of the US. EQUALITY is the key word here.

    Even Donald Trump shows to be open towards Russia – evidence is his saying that Crimea is Russian (https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/trump-russia-crimea?utm_term=.yl1a595xZ#.blade9eJZ) or the fact that he acknowledges that Russia should be back in the G7 Club (https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/09/politics/trump-russia-g8-press-conference/index.html).

    He has met with Kim Jong-Un trying to do something about he nuclear stance of North Korea. He also does not believe in the fake news of Russian interference in the American elections of 2016. Moreover, the Skripal case was another „fake news” and false flag operation to blame Russia, as it was the gas attack in Douma this April based on which the US, Great Britain and France violated the international law by attacking Syria.

    Apparently, Trump is at odds with various of his own people, the intelligence gathering agencies, officials, etc. The chasm between what he really thinks, says and does runs counter to what other American officials say and do. So then, could/may we talk about the American „double standard”?

    PS – – – Russia and China are far from being „Snow Whites” in the complex game of international politics, national interests and spheres of influence! They also do whatever they can and have to do to push for their „share” of the „global pie”. History has been alive and kicking and Francis Fukuyama was wrong!

    But, Romania SHOULD and MUST NOT FORGET to promote its own interests regionally and globally (if it can) even if this means that our beloved American and EU partners and allies may frown at us. It is OK only if we are equal allies and partners. Otherwise, some are „more equal” than others and we bandwagon!

    Romania may be western but it should stay loyal to its interests.

    At the same time, it is disconcerting that neither G4Media nor the rest of the MSM does objectively reflect anything about and on Russia except the usual anti-Russia stance. Even though in the US there are dynamic, solid and objective discussions pro- and anti-Russia. But, not in Romania. Are we equal partners with the US?